Faster than Light Communication: Quantum Entanglement

On the web date: September 17, 2022
Document creation date: September 17, 2022  original_text_pdf
Document text edit, updated: September 19, 2022  this_web_page_pdf


Richard Craddock
207 Hillcrest Rd Apt 133
Mobile, Alabama 36608, USA
Earth, Milky Way, Quadrant 1, Universe 1, Creation, God

Glowing Golden Globe .com Glowing Golden Globe .github

Introduction

Faster than light data transfer - possible.
Author: I'm not a professor. I'm not a formal research scientist. I didn't verify the results with any science organization or science community, yet (6:35 PM CDT; Mobile, AL, 36608, USA; 09 19 2022). I didn't perform any lab experiments. Nevertheless, I think I solved the problem.
Opinion - Solved. The long-awaited solution to faster-than-light-communication is completed. It is accomplished. It is finished. It has, now, been solved. It is described, herein.

Standards of Duration

Example

Point A

Point B

Four Parts of 50s is 200 (i.e., 50 MS * 4 = 200 MS; at Point A, where there is a set of 4 consecutive observerations, each 50 MS in duration, then the total is 200 MS (the duration of the observation at Point B).
It takes four events of observations each at a duration of 50 miliseconds to elapse the duration of the observation at Point B of 200 miliseconds.

Standard Set Duration

Sum Duration

A set's sum duration is its sum of durations where its numerical sum value is equal to the standard set duration at the mirrored point location.

Mirrored Point

For purposes of this document, the definition of "mirrored point" is as follows: Where Point A is measuring entangled particles corresponding to its entangled particles at Point B, Point A is a the mirrored point location of Point B, and Point B is a mirrored point location of Point A.

Standard Set of Particles

Quantity of Particles Per Measurement Per Single-Digit Code Message of Particle(s) Position-Observed

Method 1

Where change in position = Code Message Sent

Where a standard-set-duration of 4-observations-at-Point-A occurs for a standard-set-of-particles

Method 2

Where change in position = Code Message Sent

Where the probability is 50%, the odds are overcome via the measurement of a set, and, indeed, multiple sets for the same single-code-message-character where the said "sets" are sets-of-particles representing that single-code-message-character. That is to say, each code-character of a message is to be represented and measured-using-an-entire-set-of-particles versus merely using one-particle-per-code-character-of-a-message; and, in this way, the probability-problem of a measurement of a position of a particle per observation is overcome, additionally, via using a set of observations rather than merely a single observation to find a change (ambiguity, but understood).

Defintions and Explanations

"change in particle position" is the equivalent of "the change in the particle position-observed" single-code-message-character The term, single-code-message-character is used in this document to differentiate between using a single particle to measure a character versus using an entire set of particles to measure only one character of a message. And, the measuring system, described in this document, above, always uses a set of particles to measure any one, single character of a message, and it never uses a single particle, alone (only), to measure a single character.

Bottom of this Document